AlertSourceDiscuss
Skip to content
On this page

ERC-5568: Revert Reason for Required Actions

Signal to wallets that an action is needed by returning a custom revert code

⚠️ ReviewERC

Peer Review Notice

This EIP is in the process of being peer-reviewed. If you are interested in this EIP, and have feedback to share, please participate using this discussion link. Thank you!

AuthorsGavin John (@Pandapip1)
Created2022-11-02

Abstract

This ERC introduces a minimalistic machine-readable (binary) format to signal to wallets that an action needs to be taken by the user using a well-known revert reason. This custom revert reason contains just enough data to be extendable by future ERCs and to take in arbitrary parameters (up to 64 kB of data). Example use cases could include approving a token for an exchange, sending an HTTP request, or requesting the user to rotate their keys after a certain period of time to enforce good hygiene.

Motivation

Oftentimes, a smart contract needs to signal to a wallet that an action needs to be taken, such as to sign a transaction or send an HTTP request to a URL. Traditionally, this has been done by hard-coding the logic into the frontend, but this ERC allows the smart contract itself to request the action.

This means that, for example, an exchange or a market can directly tell the wallet to approve the smart contract to spend the token, vastly simplifying the front-end code.

Specification

The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.

Custom Revert Reason

To signal an action needs to be taken, a compliant smart contract MUST revert with the following error:

solidity
error WalletSignal24(uint24 instruction_id, bytes instruction_data)

The instruction_id of an instruction defined by an ERC MUST be its ERC number unless there are exceptional circumstances (be reasonable). An ERC MUST define exactly zero or one instruction_id. The structure of the instruction data for any instruction_id MUST be defined by the ERC that defines the instruction_id.

Responding to a Revert

Before submitting a transaction to the mempool, it MUST be evaluated locally. If it reverts and the revert signature matches the custom error, then the following applies.

The instruction_id, and instruction_data MUST be parsed from the revert data. The instruction SHOULD be evaluated as per the relevant ERC. If the instruction is not supported by the wallet, it MUST display an error to the user indicating that is the case. The wallet MUST then re-evaluate the transaction, except if an instruction explicitly states that the transaction MUST NOT be re-evaluated.

If an instruction is invalid, or the instruction_id, and instruction_data cannot be parsed, then an error MUST be displayed to the user indicating that is the case. The transaction MUST NOT be re-evaluated.

Rationale

This ERC was explicitly optimized for deployment gas cost and simplicity. It is expected that libraries will eventually be developed that makes sending and receiving these well-known reverts more developer-friendly.

Backwards Compatibility

Human-Readable Revert Messages

See Revert Reason Collisions.

ERC-3668

ERC-3668 can be used alongside this ERC, but it uses a different mechanism than this ERC.

Security Considerations

Revert Reason Collisions

It is unlikely that the signature of the custom error matches any custom errors in the wild. In the case that it does, no harm is caused unless the data happen to be a valid instruction, which is even more unlikely.

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.

Citation

Please cite this document as:

Gavin John, "ERC-5568: Revert Reason for Required Actions[DRAFT]," Ethereum Improvement Proposals, no. 5568, 2022. [Online serial]. Available: https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5568.